ext_134890 ([identity profile] shadhahvar.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] trans_pilgrims 2011-12-21 02:24 am (UTC)

Re: SETTING

Yet is there any point where someone being inactive with a character in game might be reason for an IC statement of "so and so has been GLaDOS'd" thus is off council in the interim? 'Cause I do like there being IC motivations behind the downsize, and at 8 members right now, with Bight's councilship up for debate soon, it's a good cutting time.

(Otherwise I look and see that we have members not active for a month -- or two months. But that's in game, versus having no idea how reachable they are outside of the game, in an OOC context for decisions. It does cut back on them as a potential IC contact for Council reasons, but we definitely do have more present councilmembers for characters to default to.)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting