on_your_nerves: (Default)
Sherlock Holmes [BBC] ([personal profile] on_your_nerves) wrote in [community profile] trans_pilgrims2012-06-01 01:15 am

New AC Poll

Based on the comments in the last AC poll, we have revised the proposed AC and are putting it up for a new vote.

AC would be bimonthly as it is now and follow the same schedule. Players wouldn't have to make AC with every character but would have an increased number they had to make it with if they played more characters. Someone with 1-2 characters has to make AC with only 1 of them. Someone with 3-4 characters has to make AC with 2. Someone with 5-6 characters has to make AC with 3 of them. Someone with 7-8 has to make it with four of them. (We've opted to keep the character breakdown the same in light of having the AC itself have less comments necessary).

Open Department Head or IC government posts can be used to make AC without the player having to do an extra post with that character. Channel Posts can be used to make AC.

Keep in mind, as well, that we're human, rather than AC-deciding robots so we can judge things with a little leniency when it's appropriate. Special circumstances, slow stretches in the game or stretches where there's a lot of plot and group threads, hiatuses from major RL events, things like that will be taken into regard with AC. If you had an awful two months IRL, managed two threads with five comments and were short one comment in your third thread or something, we'll take the whole picture into account.

AC can be met by:


Posting one open post

OR

Two threads with at least 8 comments made by your character each thread (16 in all)

OR

Three threads with at least 5 comments made by your character each thread (15 comments in all)

OR

Putting up one open event/meeting that lets others mingle, such as a movie night or training session

OR

Running one plot posted with open signups.


This poll is closed.
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 22


Do you approve of the proposed AC?

View Answers

Yes
20 (90.9%)

No
2 (9.1%)



The poll will be open for five days, until June 5th. Please vote based on what you want to see. Do not vote yes unless the AC is something you can live with. We'll keep revising until we have one that passes muster.
bequiet_hescreamed: WHY DO I UPLOAD ICONS LIKE THIS (fais)

[personal profile] bequiet_hescreamed 2012-06-01 01:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Can mods vote in this one? >.> Or not, since basically the only thing changed is the thread option(s)?

Either way, I like it - although I do have concerns that it's complicated. Plus, I think that one weakness is that the shorter-threads option allows for one less comment. It's just one comment! But still - it makes it inarguably more lax than the 8-comment option.

I'd give it my vote, but I would also support a 5-comment option that required four threads instead of three.
cityship: (Default)

Saphie

[personal profile] cityship 2012-06-01 02:58 pm (UTC)(link)
I think we opted out last one but since you and Anders weren't unanimous on this one, we ought to discuss letting you two vote on it. (Sorry since you weren't there last night we opted for a three-mod-approval to get the new poll up.)

I'm also not really sure how we can handle that dangling comment. I kinda figured we could do it by just being kinda lenient if someone doing three 5s was just one short.

Wanna modchat about it tonight? We can maybe just opt for figuring how we handle things like if someone is a short a comment here and there or has like an 8 comment and a seven coment or something. That's less the AC itself and more figuring out how we uphold it.
cityship: (Default)

Re: Saphie

[personal profile] cityship 2012-06-01 02:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Er I meant being lenient if someone doing two 8s was one short. You know what I mean.
hit_girl_mindy: (Default)

[personal profile] hit_girl_mindy 2012-06-02 01:30 am (UTC)(link)
My bad, commented on the vote with the daligig. I revoted!